New Version of the Second Amendment from the 9th Circuit Court
Last Updated on March 25, 2021 by John Galt
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not
be infringed exist”.
The opinion in Young v. Hawaii, taken in conjunction with the Ninth Circuit’s decision a few years ago in a case called Peruta vs. San Diego, means that the largest appellate court in the country has declared that the average citizen has no right to bear arms at all; instead, the state has the privilege and power to grant certain people the ability to carry a firearm in self-defense.Cam Edwards writing in Ninth Circuit Rules 2A Doesn’t Protect Right To Bear Arms
This ruling from the 9th Circus clearly seems to conflict with District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), and McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), so I would guess that this case would be headed to the US Supreme Court, which is, of course, not only under threat of packing from the Democrats but led by John Q. Roberts (the ‘Q’ is for Quisling).